Ecologic Design & Construction Process
Post-Graduate Diploma in Architecture
Educating architects to serve life and the people
Educating architects to serve life and the people
Registration is now open for the 2019-20 session of Building Beauty, which will begin in early November 2019 and run through mid-May 2020. 15 places are available and will be assigned to the best students who meet the entry requirements, demonstrate good learning capability, have completed the registration process, and paid a 10% deposit on fees by August 31, 2019. The deadline for 2019-20 registration is July 15, 2019. See details for application here.
Download the 2019-20 poster here.
Donate to the Kyriakos Pontikis Scholarship Fund here.
This program explores the principles expressed in Christopher Alexander’s The Nature of Order through an integrated approach to hands-on making, appropriate technology construction and self-aware design (at the individual and community levels). The program, housed at the Sant’Anna Institute in Sorrento, Italy, offers a one-year life-changing intensive experience in one of the world’s most remarkable environments, where the natural and the man-made have historically evolved into an integrated whole of astounding beauty.
Together, we will learn how to generate beauty that makes a difference in the real world. The program is structured by the following Principles:
There exists in the natural, cultural and physical world, a class of phenomena that are beautiful, the beauty of which has essentially to do with our everyday material and spiritual life. We want to understand what characterizes such phenomena, how they occur and change, and how, as makers, we can help in the process.
The context in which we approach problems to develop solutions acknowledges and embraces the complexity, uncertainty and change that are ever more prevalent in our world. We explore a non-conventional agenda in education and research for making, which poses beauty and its generative process centre stage.
We acknowledge that life takes place by continuously adapting the surrounding environment in an uninterrupted everyday process of adapting by making. We intend making as an adaptive process of change that predominantly occurs in the dimension of the ordinary.
Beautiful ordinary spaces have a quality whose value, once explored at the appropriate level, belongs to all human beings, and is good for everyone. Because that quality exists, makers can, at each step in the process of change, add to and expand—rather than detract from and reduce—the original quality. We define and measure the objective quality of space that emerges at the level where human beings share a common canon of values.
Space is essentially grounded on our individual and collective self, where functionality, ornament and beauty are just different names for the same thing. We explore our individual and collective self in space as a fundamental way to understanding how to make things.
Beauty emerges, in the physical world, as an inner order that is spatial. Good functionality, and the sense of belonging and wellness are by-products of that. We focus on the order of space that recurs in phenomena of beauty: what it is made of, and how we can help it to emerge and expand over time.
The quality of space can be tested through understanding the authentic feelings that connect us to the place and others in a profound way. We pursue the ability to recognize, trust and develop our own feelings as a reliable ground for testing the quality of space.
The quality of spaces does not come by design: it can only emerge during the process of making. We experience beauty in space when we see that everything around has arisen by careful choice and restless consideration of both the place and our own self.We are interested in the process of fine-tuning that creates a place: in a short-term "project" scenario, and in the longer-term, and truly "evolutionary."
Essentially a process of adaptive transformation, making beauty happens in steps whereby each step expands the pre-existent beauty and, in itself, is complete and makes full sense.We test and explore the unfolding nature of beauty generation both in the process of making and in that of teaching how to make.
Reunifying what was previously separated is central to the process—in space, in communities, and in ourselves as makers and citizens. Conventional separations (between actors, places and times of decision) are overcome and reunified at each step in a fully integrated healed/whole. We explore how to reunify self, community, design and construction at each step of the process of making.
Making has to do with understanding the order of the space (existent in the land) and that of what we want to make (existent in ourselves), and then with reunifying the two in a coherent whole. We investigate all means to make such two orders explicit, and then reinforce each other.
In a conventional building process, the means of most separations is the drawing. People make decisions, separately, by looking at drawings. We use drawings as an integral part of making: a physical, on-site, trial-and-error process based on the use of full-scale physical mock-ups. We practice full-scale mocking-up as the core system of decision-making in the building process.
Direct hands-on construction is essential to making. That is where and when everything happens; the building yard and the actual act of construction are the place and moment where the healing reunification occurs. We practice direct construction as the all-encompassing environment of making.
What did students experience in the first year of the Building Beauty program?
All of the details regarding our Post-Graduate Diploma in Architecture for the upcoming 2018-19 school year.
Video from a workshop with instructor Felice Tagliaferri, where students learned stone working techniques using all of their senses (and trusting their feelings)
At the core of Christopher Alexander’s work is a wonderful contribution to the way architects, planners and people working on their homes think about what they are creating, especially from the point of view of the psychology of space. The style and detail of his work goes in and out of fashion, but I always hoped it would develop into a real science, with its own sets of guiding algorithms through which building projects can be evaluated. We need more buildings that are warm, soulful and humane environments that can bring out the best of us.